4 ms·
Ten+ years into the DL revolution and we are still getting shallow hit piece articles like this from IEEE. Look, everyone will jump on the ART bandwagon if it
by bcatanzaro 5y ago
Ten+ years into the DL revolution and we are still getting shallow hit piece articles like this from IEEE.
Look, everyone will jump on the ART bandwagon if it ever actually beats deep learning. Machine Learning is a very empirical field! But all the people throwing rocks at Deep Learning have failed to propose anything that actually works better.
- bArray 5y ago> Ten+ years into the DL revolution and we are still getting shallow hit piece articles like this from IEEE. I think the latest IEEE articles have been a little intellectually lightweight, perhaps we're just simply not their audience. Still, in the style of IEEE papers, I would like to see references for the claims made. > But all the people throwing rocks at Deep Learning have failed to propose anything that actually works better I was thinking something similar. DL for sure has problems, but I am yet to see something better. ART doesn't just need to be better, it needs to be better in _at least_ one of: accuracy, training time, recall time, amount of training data, quality of training data.