> By the same logic if the group at large isn't giving a consistent story then unfortunately there is serious disagreement and you shouldn't just trust those at

> By the same logic if the group at large isn't giving a consistent story then unfortunately there is serious disagreement and you shouldn't just trust those at the top. I read this as "consistent among themselves" or "consistent among their own findings and predictions" or "consistently in the same direction, but with wildly different degrees" and I think they are all valid.