5 ms·
You just said that interference with private transactions was by definition a violation of liberty, so any outside action of the state would be at best a violat
by wbsss4412 5y ago
You just said that interference with private transactions was by definition a violation of liberty, so any outside action of the state would be at best a violation of liberty to secure liberty, somehow. Which, is somewhat nonsensical. There is no well defined liberty math.
- thegrimmest 5y ago> a violation of liberty to secure liberty You've pretty much got it. These are the only legitimate violations of liberty. Doesn't seem nonsensical to me.