3 ms·
> This is discriminatory since it allows It also allows me to pay you less because you're not a critical thinker. But yeah, it's probably discriminatory. We do
by waynesonfire 5y ago
> This is discriminatory since it allows
It also allows me to pay you less because you're not a critical thinker. But yeah, it's probably discriminatory. We don't want to hurt your ego.
- bigbillheck 5y agoI thought personal attacks weren't encouraged on this forum.
- toss1 5y agoIf "critical thinker" is part of the job requirement, you need to be able to measure and screen for that quality/capability. If you can't figure out how to design your screening to objectively measure, sort, & select for that desired criteria, you have no business discriminating pay rates based on it. And if you CAN & DO have a screening system that does so, you can prove you are not discriminating by making offers strongly correlated to scores in your screening system, e.g., "Strong candidates get offers $X-$Y, Exceptional=115% of Strong, Good=85% of Strong, Acceptable = 75%, lower=no offer" (presuming your screening system doesn't also include other explicitly/implicitly discriminatory criteria).