3 ms·
Is it sabotage? If he's being hired to write code, and his code is a problem, I would expect that he shouldn't get the position. He didn't tell Initrode "don'
by recursive 5y ago
Is it sabotage? If he's being hired to write code, and his code is a problem, I would expect that he shouldn't get the position. He didn't tell Initrode "don't hire". He told them "look at the code". And maybe Initrode doesn't have a problem with the code.
- 999900000999 5y agoIt just seems petty, This dude isn't your problem anymore. How does it benefit you to stop someone else from being able to feed their family.
- recursive 5y agoIt doesn't benefit you. It might benefit them though. The "feeding the family" is speculation.
- 999900000999 5y agoA family can be one person, it doesn't benefit you to prevent someone you had a bad experience with from earning an income. The vibe I get from this article, is the author was personally upset with Sten, and that's why he went out of his way to make Sten's life harder. Not something to brag about.
- recursive 5y agoSten isn't prevented from earning an income. He's potentially less likely to get a job for which he isn't a good fit. Perhaps that means he'll get another one instead? That pays more, so he can eat even more expensive food? I don't think it does much good to speculate about further downstream effects.
- tomalpha 5y agoI didn’t get that vibe, and the wording of the reference suggesting writing some code at interview seems pretty mild too. You could read something between the lines perhaps, but the wording doesn’t seem unreasonable. To me, that doesn’t seem like going out of his way to make Sten’s life harder. Sten’s ability to then write code at interview will determine his chances for getting that role. If not tested at interview, the new employer would presumably find out pretty quickly and the end result likely the same.