>your theory fails to explain what happened to the states where there was little to no interference. I'm excited to hear about these African countries that had

>your theory fails to explain what happened to the states where there was little to no interference. I'm excited to hear about these African countries that had complete autonomy, please name some. >While Belgians took part in the assassination, it wasn't like it took place in a peaceful country, out of the blue. One must have an extremely warped world view to be able to look at Belgium and Congo on a world map and handwave away the assassination of a popular leader due to his antiexploitative economic views. Some here buy the false narrative that most westerners are in Africa doing charity, I can tell... The reality is Africa is the largest net creditor to western nations and Africans have been forced to send charity TO Europe and the US for a few centuries now. Almost every foreign-funded assassination is tied to resource theft, your framing seems to ignore that Elephant in the Room on purpose.