4 ms·

At least he wasn't "objectifying" them. (for the sensitive, this is a joke about class naming convention, which didn't seem subject to female variable names in

At least he wasn't "objectifying" them. (for the sensitive, this is a joke about class naming convention, which didn't seem subject to female variable names in the article).

starfallg 5y ago
They're not fat, just overloaded!
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
  - deleted 5y ago
    [deleted]
    - chrisseaton 5y ago
      Because it’s downvoted? Probably just people generally downvoting jokes.
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
- speed_spread 5y ago
  For all its political correctness, Rust still has Fat Pointers. Which might be put to good use when doing Response Body Shaming?
  - usually 5y ago
    And the fat arrow: "=>" https://play.rust-lang.org/?code=fn%20main()%20%7B%0Amatch%20()%20%7B_%20-%3E%20()%7D%0A%7D https://play.rust-lang.org/?code=fn%20main()%20%7B%0Amatch%2...
- rhacker 5y ago
  super
zefhous 5y ago
I don't know. Is it worse to objectify them or to treat them functionally? How would you feel to be locked up and separated into discrete units, only to be used up and thrown away?