3 ms·
Ehh depends on what you call "exploited" the original 0.8 upgrade resulting fork effectively allowed a double spend https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1523
by tick_tock_tick 5y ago
Ehh depends on what you call "exploited" the original 0.8 upgrade resulting fork effectively allowed a double spend https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=152348 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=152348
- randomhodler84 5y agoNot a real double spend, just some central exchange accounting mismatch with the active chain. That’s why we wait for confirms. Still, glad you brought this up. 0.7/0.8 db issue was a scary time. Seems like a lifetime ago.