> I believe the idea of Web3/Crypto is that it's decentralized Web3 is Centralized: https://blog.wesleyac.com/posts/web3-centralized https://blog.wesleyac.com/

> I believe the idea of Web3/Crypto is that it's decentralized Web3 is Centralized: https://blog.wesleyac.com/posts/web3-centralized https://blog.wesleyac.com/posts/web3-centralized - discussed here a few days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29766497 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29766497 Even if it were decentralized, the moment a technology appears to be decentralized, we do everything in our power to add a centralized (management) layer on top (e.g. github). That layer is what the masses will flock to and eat the lunch of the original technology. If you have a technology that is already centralized which you try to decentralize it will be nothing more than a niche existence (that might not be a bad thing. See centralized Twitter vs decentralized Mastodon as an example of this) "Distribute", is more practical than "Decentralize" because it lets you articulate the players and don't have to worry about sybils. The funniest thing right now is the noisy people into NFT "art" who get their work stolen and are appealing to authority in meatspace.