2 ms·
> That's not terrible, but it was slow enough that I wondered for a few seconds if the site was broken. So what? Unless your website is offering some superfici
by kortilla 5y ago
> That's not terrible, but it was slow enough that I wondered for a few seconds if the site was broken.
So what? Unless your website is offering some superficial junk that can easily be found elsewhere, you’re not going to lose a user.
For something like photopea, there aren’t sub-second alternatives out there.
- jeppesen-io 5y agoAlmost a perfect quote of GM in the 80s when Japanese cars took over it's market share > For something like photopea, there aren’t sub-second alternatives out there. if there is't one now, there will be. Besides, with a little CDN and tweaking you improve your users enjoyment. Why not?
- cblconfederate 5y agoShow me one major media site that takes < 10 seconds to load
- kortilla 5y ago
- austhrow743 5y agoThere's plenty of other image editing software.