4 ms·
Hmm, okay, I think I understand. For the record, the 'sounds dubious' comment was directed at the claim that we know the "exact" age of the moon. It is more a
by 37 5y ago
Hmm, okay, I think I understand.
For the record, the 'sounds dubious' comment was directed at the claim that we know the "exact" age of the moon. It is more a criticism of shoddy journalism than a statement of my knowledge of the subject. I know enough to know that we cannot pinpoint the "exact" age of the moon.
And the 'knowledgeable astronomers' claim was almost more of a meek confession that idk wtf I am talking about. It was not meant sarcastically at all. I know a little, but not as much as people who went to school and do this stuff professionally.
Everyone, please note: I'm not trying to back-peddle or make excuses or anything like that here, just explaining my reasoning.
(Edit: but thanks for the criticism, it really does help to see your point of view on these things. This is a discussion board after all.)
- pdonis 5y ago> the 'sounds dubious' comment was directed at the claim that we know the "exact" age of the moon. Yes, I agree shoddy journalism is a pain. I never even read the articles, I just look for a link to the actual paper (btw, thank you for providing it).
- jasonwatkinspdx 5y agoThe quality of pop science journalism is absolutely atrocious, but I'm not gonna pretend I know the answer to that problem. It just annoys me a lot.