8 ms·
Whereas in the US necessary flights have been cancelled left and right. I had to take a series of flights in the past two weeks, and it was an absolute mess.
by skohan 5y ago
Whereas in the US necessary flights have been cancelled left and right. I had to take a series of flights in the past two weeks, and it was an absolute mess. By the third trip, I honestly had no expectation that my flight would take off on time, if at all.
That and getting a PCR test this week in the NYC area seems totally non-functional. Appointments have to be made days in advance, for results which can several days to come back. It's a far cry form Germany where I can get same day service at any number of testing centers, and pay to get expedited results if I need to.
How can these systems be so broken, and why isn't capitalism solving them?
- ThalesX 5y ago> How can these systems be so broken, and why isn't capitalism solving them? I’d wager it’s because free markets solve problems not entrenched cronies with political strings.
- NikolaeVarius 5y agoI dont understand. COVID tests are completely free, subsidized by the government. You can get COVID tests at very high prices on the "black market". If you don't want to pay those prices, you stand on line at the free testing areas. Why do you think capitalism is broken here when its working just fine. The supply of testing is too low since its free to take them officially and there is massive demand
- skohan 5y agoAre you talking about PCR tests, or antigen tests? All I can tell you is that this week, my Aunt and I were both flying out of EWR. She needed a PCR test for the flight which was supposed to be Tuesday, and she started looking on Friday, but it was almost impossible to find anywhere with an appointment available before Thursday. And even those gave a very fuzzy 1-3 day estimate for results, which is quite unhelpful when you have to take the test within 72 hours of departure. She spent an entire day trying to find somewhere which would take walk-ins, and eventually found a place through a fiend-of-a-friend-of-a-friend who could get her in, although she did have to push the flight back by a day. From my perspective, this just seemed totally broken. I don't understand how there could not be a vendor, easily discoverable through Google which could deliver same-day or next-day results at whatever price the market would bear, even if it was $300 or $500 or whatever. It felt like being in a developing country where things just can't be depended on to work properly.
- smabie 5y agoYou can order at-home rapid antigen supervised (over webcam) tests to your home that are accepted for flights. Not sure it would come over night though. But you're right it is totally broken: they should be auctioning these PCR testing slots to the highest bidder. But of course then there would uproar about "price gouging." Somewhat similar to how everyone is complaining they can't find PS5s and yet Sony is unwilling to raise topics because the optics would be bad.
- skohan 5y agoAre you sure there are at-home antigen tests which are universally accepted for international travel? I have been on a number of international flights during this period, and having read the entry requirements for a few different countries, this would be the first I have heard of this.
- smabie 5y agoYes, however I just checked and they seem unavailable at the moment.
- TheDudeMan 5y ago> the government Which of the many governments in the world are you talking about?
- NikolaeVarius 5y agoSo the post is talking about NYC, which exists in the USA, so I presume its fairly obvious what Government
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- sovnade 5y agoIf you haven't been for a covid test lately, especially in a populated area, things have changed significantly. Lines are 4-12 hours long and often run out of tests before they can get to everyone. There are no appointments available. Urgent Care centers are overrun and can't handle nearly as many tests as people are requesting.
- NikolaeVarius 5y agoHow does this disprove market theory. The tests are free due to subsidizing. High demand leads to shortages.
- sovnade 5y agoBecause one of the options you stated (waiting in line) isn't even an option in a lot of areas. This specific scenario has nothing to do with market theory. It's a combination of regulation, subsidization, and infrastructure. We're not buying playstations.
- skohan 5y agoAre PCR tests free in the US? I found tons of paid testing services when looking, they just didn't have capacity.
- sovnade 5y agoYes they're free. I haven't paid for an antigen test or PCR test and I've had probably half a dozen of each.
- toolz 5y agoCapitalism? The US healthcare system is the most socially funded healthcare system in the world by a long shot. Not much capitalism to be seen there.
- TheDudeMan 5y agoTry the take-home tests. Buy them days or months in advance. Get results within minutes.
- toolz 5y agoI've looked multiple times at dozens of stores. In my area of the U.S. they can't be found in stock.
- phil21 5y agoYes. That's the whole buy them months in advance part so you are prepared everyone in the US apparently forgot about. I feel like I was raised in a different generation. Preparation is a thing. It was quite obvious we were likely to have a covid spike this winter. Anyone without a stock of antigen tests at this point has simply been irresponsible as it was trivial to buy a few boxes at $14/ea at walmart the past 6mo.
- dayvid 5y agoAny place in the US that requires appointments has never been reliable for me. If I went that route I would have to wait weeks to months to get a vaccine or PCR test. Instead, poorer neighborhoods usually have hospitals or health centers that offer walk-up or drive-through services for vaccinations and tests. Sadly, most of the people in those neighborhoods don't use the services, so if you go right when they open you can get vaccinated or a PCR test with barely any wait. I waited 5 minutes to get my vaccine in Miami, and I waited about 15 minutes in a drive-through in Boston to get a PCR test with results the next day.
- lucaspm98 5y agoThe government is subsidizing testing so very few people, even those who would could afford it otherwise, will be willing to pay for it. With no cost, controlling demand becomes a function of time instead of price. Whether this is a better solution is up for debate but capitalism isn’t filling the need efficiently because, well, it isn’t even close to a free market.
- skohan 5y agoI would think that in a city like New York with multiple large international airports, there would be plenty of people willing to pay to get the PCR tests they need to get on an international flight on time. There must be thousands of people per day who need to get a test to get on a flight at EWR or JFK. Currently that appears not to be the case, and there is no simple and reliable way to guarantee getting a test on time. This seems to be a market failure, and it is not obvious to me why the market has not stepped in to fill this gap.
- xur17 5y agoMy local airport has PCR tests available with results in 35 minutes for $200. Every time I've looked, they have tons of appointments available for the same hour / within a few minutes. And outside of the airport, last time I flew United directed me to some options that were $150, but had results the same day. At least where I live, there are definitely quicker options if you are willing to pay.
- exhilaration 5y agoYou can definitely pay to get your PCR test expedited all over the place. It's around $200 to $300. Ask on the NYC subreddit.
- VeninVidiaVicii 5y agoHell… I work in a bacterial genetics lab, maybe I should just be doing qPCR and making some bank on the side.
- volkl48 5y agoI've flown quite a bit in the past year - while there's been more cancellations than pre-pandemic, the last few weeks are outliers. "Capitalism" can't produce new staff instantly at any price when staff are in industries that require substantial training/testing prior to being allowed to work after hiring (or after any long furlough/hiatus of not working, even if they remained officially employed). -------- Anyway, you've got a perfect storm of issues. Airlines have depleted crews from cutting too deeply in the early pandemic. Training/retraining large numbers of people takes lots of time, only so many people are actually qualified to teach or test them. Airlines were already running what staff they have with as minimal spare capacity as they could get away with to meet demand that's come roaring back far faster than expected, especially for the holiday season. The US is currently running ~83% of 2019 passenger loads (12/20-1/4 passenger count in 2019/20 - 36.6m, 2021/22 - 30.7m), per the TSA checkpoint numbers. And then....you have a new COVID wave that's leading to substantial portions of the workforce coming down with it and being unable to work for at least a week during their absolute highest load period. ------- Are the airlines entirely "not at fault"? No. They cut too deeply in the early pandemic. And they've been too greedy chasing $$$ for renewed demand and added too many flights too quickly, cutting their spare capacity for issues that could crop up to nothing...and now they have. But the severity of this COVID wave is significantly worse (in terms of # of people infected at once, not referring to illness severity) and pretty much every area of the workforce (that's actually in-person) is having similar issues. Many public schools in the US are basically just functioning as babysitters this week if they're open because they have too many teachers and students out to actually run classes normally.
- dehrmann 5y ago> why isn't capitalism solving them? Because there's no money in it. We're likely going to have a surge of cases over January (judging by what happened in South Africa). If I'm a test maker/provider, I'm not going to spend a week ramping up production, have the extra tests arrive in two weeks, just do be on the downside of the surge. It's the same reason I didn't build up more capacity in October. There's a vaccine and boosters are starting. Why would I take a gamble on a new variant? One role of government is to step in when markets fail. We saw test shortages a year ago, and a new variant was an eventual likelihood. The government needed to place the test orders so that the risk didn't get shifted to markets uninterested in that risk. This is almost entirely a failure of government leadership. To its credit, the US government did a really good job ordering vaccines. It's just handled testing very poorly.