3 ms·
The point you are replying to is that stainless steel is unnecessary, because 'normal' steel will ast more than 1000 years in the conditions described.
by Cogito 5y ago
The point you are replying to is that stainless steel is unnecessary, because 'normal' steel will ast more than 1000 years in the conditions described.
- Retric 5y agoNot when one of the assumptions is that the shell will be seriously compromised at some point. Stainless steel is just another durability vs cost tradeoff, but it could be what makes the difference between repair vs rebuilding and it’s not that expensive. Wood for example could hypothetically last that long, but both fire and leaks are a real concern.