> How do you implement that without absolutely draconian measures? You don't, which is why I was thinking it had to be sarcasm. That said, it sounds just ideal

> How do you implement that without absolutely draconian measures? You don't, which is why I was thinking it had to be sarcasm. That said, it sounds just idealistic enough that someone would blurt it out without thinking. The other part that is confusing is what's an efficient programming language? The answer is none. It's all about how programmers write their code. Sometimes you're optimizing for performance, but other times you're solving a niche problem.