5 ms·

one line to "fix" it - var notCrapAtAll = window.o_O; happy?

• Bootvis 15y ago
  Yes, until I integrate code with others that use '^_^', or '<8)' or ... ad infinitum. An easy to type self explanatory name would help a lot. Maybe the whole project is a joke but then it's a very elaborate one.
  • skb_ 15y ago
    well '^_^' and '<8' are illegal identifiers, so that can't happen
    • addandsubtract 15y ago
      (╯°□°）╯︵('Post', function(){ })
  • threepointone 15y ago
    Wouldn't matter, because they'll have their own references as well. Why does this variable name offend you so much?
    • Bootvis 15y ago
      It does not offend me but I just don't like it and would not use it in my own code (which is indeed not necessary). I don't like it because it's relatively hard to type and naming it in this way does not serve any goal. I'm not satisfied by just changing it because it will, at least, hinder reading of third party code and generate silly arguments between developers. I'd rather have the developers of the framework suggest something easy to type like 'e', 'E', or 'eb'.