3 ms·
The difference between the cyclist and motorist is these scenarios is that while both are dangerous and stupid, the motorist at least has the innate protection
by lp0_on_fire 5y ago
The difference between the cyclist and motorist is these scenarios is that while both are dangerous and stupid, the motorist at least has the innate protection of the vehicle in case of an accident.
The cyclist has a helmet and if they're really lucky some Kevlar sewn into their gear.
In a collision 1 ton vehicle vs a couple hundred pounds of flesh and whatever the bike is made of, the 1 ton vehicle almost always wins.
Given the risk profile of cyclist versus vehicle you'd think that cyclists would be a bit more aware of their surroundings.
- fknorangesite 5y ago> Given the risk profile of cyclist versus vehicle you'd think that cyclists would be a bit more aware of their surroundings. Given how dangerous a car is and how much disproportionate damage they can do to the people and property around them, you'd think that drivers would be a bit more aware of their surroundings.
- lp0_on_fire 5y agoYes? I don't understand why you think you've got me in a gotcha here. Did I say something that's making you think I don't believe drivers in vehicles shouldn't be more aware of their surroundings?