3 ms·
This sounds similar to the peer review process in publishing. Typically, getting other people to actually agree to voluntarily review your work is indeed a sign
by gunapologist99 5y ago
This sounds similar to the peer review process in publishing. Typically, getting other people to actually agree to voluntarily review your work is indeed a significant hurdle if the requested paper/book/chapter/white paper/code review is lengthy.
There is an easy way to resolve this:
Request peer review for SMALLER chunks of code.
Git makes this exceptionally easy -- it's certainly far easier than reviewing a large document with Word track changes!
- ahtihn 5y agoThe problem is that small changes are barely worth reviewing. Also a series of small changes can obfuscate the larger context of all those changes. Each small change on its own might make sense and be ok to a reviewer, but if you step back and look at the series of changes together there might be some issues that could have been noticed.