Regarding Oregon, one of the various criticisms of the place is that people act inclusive on ethnic diversity but have never been challenged on it as the popula

Regarding Oregon, one of the various criticisms of the place is that people act inclusive on ethnic diversity but have never been challenged on it as the population isn't there. So the way it would actually materialize is always up for skepticism, debate and question. According to Oregon government: Among people living in Oregon in 2016, 76% identified as white, 13% Latina(o), 5% Asian and Pacific Islander, 2% African American, 1% American Indian and Alaska Native, and 3% two or more races. And then that is further bolstered by the original point of Oregon to begin with. The territory and state was founded on extremely exclusionary and unambiguously racist principles, specifically against black people setting foot in its borders, and that can always be used to undermine how convincing its progressive rebranding is. Simple because its so meme-worthy how hard they are trying, without ever being confronted with a circumstance to put it into action. It also stands to reason that there are people, families, dynasties, that harbor the continuous exclusionist ideals of Oregon, from its inception.