4 ms·
> A feature branch is still expected to have meaningful commits, and is usually used for collaboration between several coders. No, not really. In fact, some is
by fivea 5y ago
> A feature branch is still expected to have meaningful commits, and is usually used for collaboration between several coders.
No, not really. In fact, some issue tracking software equate feature branches with tickets, worked on by a single person.
> What OP describes is a temporary work branch that belongs to a single person, and has a bunch of meaningless commits.
Aka a feature branch.
- int_19h 5y agoI guess we'll have to agree to disagree, then. In my 20 years in this industry, I've never seen a feature branch like that.