We can have that discussion, fiction is a popular genre and I don't see why we can't have a lawsuit fiction. Just don't confuse it with reality. Anyway, I don

We can have that discussion, fiction is a popular genre and I don't see why we can't have a lawsuit fiction. Just don't confuse it with reality. Anyway, I don't like to pretend that we are in a court. Law is simply a system that countries find useful to deal with issues and it is its own thing that not always just and can change over time and need specialisation for doing correctly. Just remember, Alan Turing was lawfully castrated back in the 50s. Let's not pretend that the lawful process is analogous to justice, it's simply a rules system where actors are executing the rules based on the available information and cannot be performed when rules, actors or information is missing. Even if we were judges, how are we supposed to execute the legal process without collecting the necessary data, have the claims and defences? Therefore, the legal definition is irrelevant and it's actually wrecking the discussion by pushing it to a position where we don't have the tools to work on.