> You're making the assumption that Holmes wronged "commoners" with malicious intent. Nope. I take from the text that prosecutors-and-or-law-itself defend the

> You're making the assumption that Holmes wronged "commoners" with malicious intent. Nope. I take from the text that prosecutors-and-or-law-itself defend the interests of super rich better than the interests/well-being of commoners. > I would be very careful before jumping to conclusions and asserting with high confidence that the court verdict is flawed. Good for you. I'm not saying it is flawed, neither am I passing judgement on who's guilty... I'm saying it seems the whole system is favoring the some over others.