My impression from reading half of the article is that the author _really_ prides himself with being anti-dogmatic. Smells like the type with strong opinions on

My impression from reading half of the article is that the author _really_ prides himself with being anti-dogmatic. Smells like the type with strong opinions on everything where a "healthy discussion" is the most important thing rather than actual teamwork getting things built with a (gasp) suboptimal tech stack and imperfect ways of working. I should know because I was like that before I read the pragmatic programmer.