3 ms·
TrueNAS just packages minio, so it would seem to be the same result but with less flexibility and visibility to the cluster. Although if the strategy is to not
by moondev 5y ago
TrueNAS just packages minio, so it would seem to be the same result but with less flexibility and visibility to the cluster. Although if the strategy is to not hyperconverge storage that could be desired I guess
- rjzzleep 5y agoYou are indeed correct, but minio is actually a lot of components. And in the case of TrueNAS they handle most of the storage related components with a minio object gateway running on top. A pure kubernetes deployment is more complex(although it's all part of the same binary i think). I could be completely wrong though.
- moondev 5y agoIn truenas scale (based on linux not freebsd) they actually run most integrated and 3rd party "apps" (including minio) inside a k3s cluster running on truenas itself
- rjzzleep 5y agoIs TrueNAS Scale stable yet?
- moondev 5y agoIt seems to be under pretty active development but I do like their strategy of releasing early and often. I haven't run into any issues yet with it in my lab. My biggest wishes for Truenas Scale: 1. NVMe-oF support (over RDMA or TCP) 2. aarch64 uefi iso I could see Truenas Scale overtaking Proxmox soon in the KVM space, their API and UI are already more enjoyable to use IMO.
- willis936 5y agoThey're in RC now. In terms of data loss: I'm not concerned with what I've seen. Some features are still missing, such as SED control. I think most of things I wish were there aren't present on core either, such as VM VNC clipboard and solutions to the web UI logging out often when 2FA is enabled and some mysterious directory locking issue when pulling dropbox.