3 ms·
Some would say that spending $6 trillion in < 2 years on largely progressive programs is a pretty hard left swing. Others say that since the latest $4 trillion
by djrogers 5y ago
Some would say that spending $6 trillion in < 2 years on largely progressive programs is a pretty hard left swing. Others say that since the latest $4 trillion hasn’t passed yet we’re not left enough.
Ill leave the judgement to you, but it’s pretty obvious that things are not the same today as they were 3 years ago.
- KittenInABox 5y agoI mean why are we counting 2 years when the "left-leaning" party wasn't even in power 1 year ago?
- lucaspm98 5y agoEven those on the right were, at least temporarily, willing to accept unprecedented levels of government spending.
- cycrutchfield 5y agoThe right has not been truly fiscally conservative for decades. Maybe you are the anomalous one, as your party seems to have transitioned to cults of personality lacking any sort of coherent ideology.
- honkycat 5y agoPlease show receipts here. You mean the infrastructure bill? That is only 1 trillion? What do you think is going to happen if we stop maintaining our infrastructure?
- TeeMassive 5y agoThe problem with the infrastructure bill is that the price tag was hidden with programs that needed to be renewed periodically.
- mschuster91 5y agoIt will survive for another decade or so, but without funding for maintenance and repair, at the point where it gets actually too unsafe to use or collapses during regular use it will be either a Democrat president getting under fire from Republicans for "not doing enough about infrastructure" or a Republican president blaming past Democrats for being "unwilling to fund infrastructure" - and the latter would actually be correct this time, given how Manchin acted.
- diputsmonro 5y agoYeah, that might have something to do with a major global pandemic, the response to which we completely bothched in our country. Let's see, who was the party in charge then, hmm...