I suspect you may have a point hidden within here, a point that I might even agree with... But it's hard to understand that point and believe that you are disc

I suspect you may have a point hidden within here, a point that I might even agree with... But it's hard to understand that point and believe that you are discussing in good faith when you conflate things that you must know not to, given your implied knowledge. Econometrics (methodology) and neoclassical (school of thought) are on different "axes" if you will, if you were to try to decompose economics into into orthogonal components. I know that's a simplification Could you perhaps critique econometrics on its own? Edit 1 because I can't type Edit 2 to add this comment -- aww_dangs comment like 2 below here and 2 deeper is the closest to the critique this guy wanted to give