3 ms·
The two accounts aren't necessarily incompatible, and they can be interpreted as offering two parallel perspectives of Creation: the first with a cosmological f
by dane-pgp 5y ago
The two accounts aren't necessarily incompatible, and they can be interpreted as offering two parallel perspectives of Creation: the first with a cosmological focus, and the second with a sociological one. A synthesis of the two accounts would give an order something like this:
Fluid (the proto-Earth which didn't have a distinct atmosphere), solid Earth (with liquid water forming oceans, and a gaseous atmosphere), plants, animals, humans, Adam, the garden of Eden (in an area that had been barren), (animals brought to Adam for naming), Eve.
- SeanLuke 5y agoMeh, apologetics. Either the water was first or the land was. Either man was explicitly created before the plants, or he was explicitly created 3 days after them. On and on. There are tons of irreconcilable differences among the creation accounts.