4 ms·
> "For the past two years, Americans have accepted more harm to children in exchange for less harm to adults." The overall tone and style of this article is ju
by StevePerkins 5y ago
> "For the past two years, Americans have accepted more harm to children in exchange for less harm to adults."
The overall tone and style of this article is just... I don't know.
As a parent of elementary school children, I spent 2020 and 2021 seeing this stuff first-hand. Having arguments with other (non-parent) liberal friends on social media. Once they discovered that I was out of step on this one item of the current moment's orthodoxy, suddenly I was "voted off the island" altogether.
It was surreal. People who I thought were personal friends, a lot of their minds just flipped like a switch, and suddenly I was immediately and completely shifted over into the "right-winger" mental bucket. It wasn't just the "you think of school as free daycare" ignorant assumptions. I had friends assume that my views had changed on abortion, climate change, etc.
I still can't wrap my head around some of those conversations. I have completely abandoned social media, cut myself off from the vast majority of what I thought was my social support system, and discarded any delusions about political or cultural identity fundamentally having any bearing on human nature.
The New York Times was ONE OF THE PRIMARY DRIVERS of my social cohort's orthodoxy, to which I had become a heretic and outcast. To go through all of that, and then read an article from the same New York Times, echoing the same heresy? FUCK YOU. It's just too much.
I've noticed over the past few weeks that this article's main thrust is taking shape and being established all over the place as the new orthodoxy of the current moment. All of these harms were seen and known even at the time, a year and a half ago (my children aren't seeing a therapist for nothing), and were downplayed or dismissed outright. It seems unfathomable that the narrative has flipped around 180-degree so abruptly. I believe that the focus on harms seen in minority children is the loophole, or "new information", that seems to give people mental "permission" to change their viewpoint now.
The brutal truth is that in Year 3, even most progressives are reaching the point of being "over" the pandemic. So they are able to open their eyes and minds a bit. I don't know whether that enough for people to revisit the attitudes and assumptions that they were making back at the time. I don't know whether I even want to reconcile with most of those old friends even if they do. But it makes me sick to my stomach watching the NYT shift and slither from one zeitgeist to the next.
- empressplay 5y agoThe game-changer here is Omicron. It kills far less grandmothers and elderly teachers -- arguably a manageable / acceptable number of them. Hence, keeping schools remote in an Omicron-dominant world doesn't make sense. I feel your pain about the political binary we've developed though. I hold varying positions on a number of issues and would have formerly been called an 'independent' but now I'm just on the opposite side of anyone I talk to
- reducesuffering 5y agoWe've had the lagged death rates from Omicron in South Africa over a week ago. It's apparent that Omicron is the most contagious, least deadly variant and it cuts through vaccinations. Vaccinations and boosters are preventing severe hospitalizations but not strong enough to confer herd immunity. Omicron has also shown how previous infection natural immunity confers a broader protection in this case. The Democratic government and media is slowly pivoting the messaging so there's not too much cognitive dissonance for your antagonists. Everyone is getting Omicron, we'll mostly be ok, the pandemic will be over, welcome to another influenza like virus.
- clairity 5y ago> "The New York Times ... FUCK YOU." i'm so glad more and more people are coming to this realization. the nytimes is an awful news source, npr as well, for their unadulterated power bias: they want, and want to support, (democrat) power, and will run with any democrat narrative that meets that objective. it simply doesn't matter if the narrative has factual basis, or if a 180° reversal is required, as repetition will be used to ingrain it in sympathetic minds to be broadcast into enclaves and social groups all over. it literally feels like 1984's "ministry of truth" being actualized. we need more independent thinkers cutting through this bullshit.
- aahortwwy 5y agoI'm depressed it's taken so long...