> Physiological addiction is more real No it isn’t. > in that your body forms a physical dependency on something that can kill you if you don't have it. Yes,

> Physiological addiction is more real No it isn’t. > in that your body forms a physical dependency on something that can kill you if you don't have it. Yes, sometimes it can kill to withdraw without support. But that isn’t what makes something real or not. > Mental addiction is treated entirely differently and is far less severe. Is it? Can you support that claim? I’ve seen pot addicts ruin their lives and die. That doesn’t seem ‘far less severe’ to me.