3 ms·
> There is no such thing as a free lunch. This doesn't mean anything. It's not evidence of anything. You can't go to court and argue there's no such thing as a
by emptysongglass 5y ago
> There is no such thing as a free lunch.
This doesn't mean anything. It's not evidence of anything. You can't go to court and argue there's no such thing as a free lunch.
There's free lunches out there, literally, somebody puts a literal free lunch out next to the dumpster for the less fortunate all the time. There's losers and winners with no reason to be found for why. Some guy buys Bitcoin at 5 bucks, becomes a billionaire and doesn't turn into the archetypal power-mad lunatic burning his fortunes on lambos.
Here's the actual woo: desperate attempts to overlay patterns of meaning to a universe that does not subscribe to Abrahamic values.
Some people will take psychedelics and have enduring negative impressions, sometimes for the rest of their life. Others, like myself, will use it to shapechange out of a history of abuse by their parents. No one can know which of the cards they'll pick.
But I can tell you, from the many I have directly known to take it, a fraction succumbed to permanent, negative, distorted beliefs. Some got a free lunch, some few did not.
- Stupulous 5y agoNo free lunch carries some weight in this context. If there is a chemical that has a very positive effect in humans, there is probably a reason that humans didn't evolve to produce that chemical or exist in the state that the chemical induces. That reason could be related to what you suggest, that the actual effect is a mixed bag and doesn't wind up worth it. It could be that our environment has changed to make it beneficial and evolution hasn't caught up. It could be that dreams are already the same thing and we're not sleeping enough or the right way, so psychadelics are filling the gap. In general, though, it's that the benefits are outweighed by costs. No free lunch is a reasonable prior in biology.