4 ms·
Shocking to see what passed as acceptable video quality back in 2007.
by jaywalk 5y ago
Shocking to see what passed as acceptable video quality back in 2007.
- necovek 5y agoWithout checking, I would guess it was more related to limited upload speeds: video was probably recorded at a much higher bitrate, but then uploading that...
- chrismorgan 5y ago$ yt-dlp -F 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xC5uEe5OzNQ' [youtube] xC5uEe5OzNQ: Downloading webpage [youtube] xC5uEe5OzNQ: Downloading android player API JSON [info] Available formats for xC5uEe5OzNQ: ID EXT RESOLUTION FPS │ FILESIZE TBR PROTO │ VCODEC VBR ACODEC ABR ASR MORE INFO ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── sb2 mhtml 48x27 │ mhtml │ images storyboard sb1 mhtml 60x45 │ mhtml │ images storyboard sb0 mhtml 120x90 │ mhtml │ images storyboard 139 m4a │ 1.55MiB 47k https │ audio only mp4a.40.5 47k 22050Hz low, m4a_dash 140 m4a │ 4.13MiB 127k https │ audio only mp4a.40.2 127k 44100Hz medium, m4a_dash 251 webm │ 4.11MiB 126k https │ audio only opus 126k 48000Hz medium, webm_dash 17 3gp 176x144 8 │ 2.67MiB 82k https │ mp4v.20.3 82k mp4a.40.2 0k 22050Hz 144p 160 mp4 192x144 25 │ 1006.62KiB 30k https │ avc1.4d400b 30k video only 144p, mp4_dash 278 webm 192x144 25 │ 1.70MiB 52k https │ vp9 52k video only 144p, webm_dash 133 mp4 320x240 25 │ 2.01MiB 61k https │ avc1.4d400d 61k video only 240p, mp4_dash 18 mp4 320x240 25 │ 9.42MiB 290k https │ avc1.42001E 290k mp4a.40.2 0k 44100Hz 240p 242 webm 320x240 25 │ 2.81MiB 86k https │ vp9 86k video only 240p, webm_dash None of these will be the format it was originally uploaded in, but I’d guess format 133 (~61 kbps) to be the closest for the video part, at 2MB. Judging by the sound of it, the original audio bit rate was probably higher than the video bit rate!
- ComodoHacker 5y agoI've been looking for youtube-dl with saner and parsable -F output. Thanks for suggestion!