31 ms·
This describes a lot of terrible practices, but they aren't Scrum. Scrum is what's defined in the scrum guide. If you do something else and call it scrum, it's
by davidham 5y ago
This describes a lot of terrible practices, but they aren't Scrum. Scrum is what's defined in the scrum guide. If you do something else and call it scrum, it's not scrum's fault.
Scrum is all about breaking down large, complex projects so they can be delivered incrementally, then delivering those increments. Then you incorporate feedback from your stakeholders, including new requirements or work. Then you reflect on how it went and adjust your process. Then you do it again.
I have seen Scrum suck too, but mostly because the org left out or ignored some huge part of what makes it work. But the framework itself makes a lot of sense, and I haven't seen another that works better.
- satyrnein 5y agoThe concepts you listed are pretty uncontroversial. However, the more specific things the article and other commenters here are complaining about (fixed length sprints, daily scrums, etc) are definitely in the Scrum Guide.