3 ms·

This small child has a better UX than many things I have been forced to implement. At least as it iterates, improvements occur that make the UX better and provi

• classified 5y ago
  Maybe due to Agile management?
• chrisfinazzo 5y ago
  Humans get upgrades for free. With Dogs, you apply the patches yourself.* Cats? Fuck that, those assholes want or don't need you. * Results not guaranteed, past performance is no indication of future results. Please read the instruction manual for all possible upgrade scenarios.** ** You believed that shit? Actually, we lied, there are no instructions and everyone is just improvising all the time! (Evil laughter) I'll just be over here in a corner trying not to cry...
• technothrasher 5y ago
  "At least as it iterates, improvements occur that make the UX better and provide a more pleasant experience." Certainly more interesting features get activated. But at least with my model, the error reporting got a lot more complicated and the input acceptance rate dropped considerably around the time the product turned 15 years old.
  • chrisfinazzo 5y ago
    I believe this technique is called fuzzing - Adversarial QA testing to make sure the prior sysadmins weren't total morons and left the system in an unusable state before deploying it to production. As you say, the reporting is inscrutable, so I'd guess there are still a few bugs to be worked out.