3 ms·
I didn't give any query to be debunked. I gave an example of a query to see the copycat sites. It does that just fine. Re-read it with some benefit of the dou
by tyingq 5y ago
I didn't give any query to be debunked. I gave an example of a query to see the copycat sites. It does that just fine. Re-read it with some benefit of the doubt maybe? Your rant seems to be based on the idea that my upthread post was something that it wasn't. I did note that one copycat site was ranking above SO, but that was secondary.
As for a query with a shit ton of ads and widgets? Try vegas hotels, or anything else with lots of widgets and ads. The travel space has a lot of them.
- endisneigh 5y agoAll I’m saying is that claims should have proof
- tyingq 5y agoProof of what? That google didn't used to have ads above organic results? That they added more and more over time? That some queries (vegas hotels) have no organic results above the fold? Those are all common knowledge. Burden of proof of the opposite would be on you. I don't happen to have a historical screenshot history of SERP results specific to StackOverflow copycats, no. I'll concede that.
- endisneigh 5y ago> Burden of proof of the opposite would be on you. What, lol. I'm not making any claims. You're the one saying Google is becoming complacent. I'm asking for proof of this, lol. >> I believe they've become more complacent since there is no competitive pressure, yes.
- dang 5y agoWould you please make your substantive points without degenerating into the flamewar style? You did it repeatedly in this thread, and worse each time. That's the opposite of the direction we want things to go here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html