4 ms·
> you're argument is basically that any speculation on an issue is unreasonable. I'm sure you never speculate on anything I try not to make nonsensical conject
by leroy_masochist 5y ago
> you're argument is basically that any speculation on an issue is unreasonable. I'm sure you never speculate on anything
I try not to make nonsensical conjectures in public forums, if that is the question you're asking.
- ineedasername 5y agoI don't think it's nonsense the think it's possible, and not too implausible, that influential people placed on a Board due to their influence may actually have used that influence, or that their influence played a passive part in this. (see my other response on that.) Let's part ways on this topic though: You seem to be verging close to personal attacks, and so we've passed the point of useful discussion.