4 ms·
I'm sure the author has no business relationship at all with Theranos and merely knows her socially. Plausible deniability is useful in this kind of situation.
by mywittyname 5y ago
I'm sure the author has no business relationship at all with Theranos and merely knows her socially.
Plausible deniability is useful in this kind of situation.
- anthony_romeo 5y agoMy main point from above: > I do get frustrated seeing these sorts of vague cynical quips levying *specific* accusations based more upon a gut plausibility of a scenario rather than a clear outline of information.
- elzbardico 5y agoWe got it and I couldn’t possibly agree more if you didn’t obnoxiously cut and pasted the same criticism for every subsequent message that failed to satisfy your standards. Sometimes people don’t get our point, so we just move on
- anthony_romeo 5y agoUnderstood. I admittedly got slightly miffed when the first few replies I received in a short time were conjecture. As an aside, one reply had mentioned plausible deniability… perhaps ‘plausible accusability’ also exists, wherein any hypothetical crime one can imagine is presumed to have factually occurred unless 100% disproven.