13 ms·
Ruby breaks these things. But Ruby is not generally even considered for a lot of what Java is used for. Those two things aren't independent. Don't get me wro
by angelbob 15y ago
Ruby breaks these things. But Ruby is not generally even considered for a lot of what Java is used for.
Those two things aren't independent.
Don't get me wrong, I like Ruby far better than Java. But Ruby is simply not considered a stable enough language for your huge app that you plan to maintain for 20+ years... Nor should it be.
Java is that stable. On the flip side, Ruby is improving much more quickly than Java. I write small apps I plan to maintain frequently far more often than I write apps that need to sail onward for 20+ years.
Two different market niches, defined by two different groups of customers.