4 ms·
> owl selector is pretty slow when it comes to being processed by browsers I'm sure this hasn't been relevant for about 15 years. CSS rendering is _fast_.
by the_other 5y ago
> owl selector is pretty slow when it comes to being processed by browsers
I'm sure this hasn't been relevant for about 15 years. CSS rendering is _fast_.
- Kavelach 5y agoAs I mentioned above - one or two clauses like that won't hurt performance, but I have seen situations, when bad CSS (a lot of *'s, too long selectors, a lot of dead and unused clauses) actually had a measurable impact on websites' performance. This especially comes into play, if you deal with a lot of nested HTML elements or when you modify the site's HTML a lot.
- the_other 5y agoThat sounds like a different problem from using the owl selector. That sounds like bad coding and app design.