3 ms·
From another commenter in the thread I found this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_line#Ford_Motor_Company_.281908-1915.29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A
by jsdalton 15y ago
From another commenter in the thread I found this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_line#Ford_Motor_Company_.281908-1915.29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_line#Ford_Motor_Compan...
"As a result of these developments in method, Ford's cars came off the line in three minute intervals. This was much faster than previous methods, increasing production by eight to one (requiring 12.5 man-hours before, 1 hour 33 minutes after), while using less manpower.[2] It was so successful, paint became a bottleneck. Only japan black would dry fast enough, forcing the company to drop the variety of colors available before 1914, until fast-drying Duco lacquer was developed in 1926.[2] In 1914, an assembly line worker could buy a Model T with four months' pay.[2]
"The assembly line technique was an integral part of the diffusion of the automobile into American society. Decreased costs of production allowed the cost of the Model T to drop within the budget of the American middle class. In 1908, the price of a Model T was around $825, and by 1912 it had dropped to around $575. This price reduction is comparable to a drop from $15,000 to $10,000 in dollar terms from the year 2000."
To me those numbers are quite significant. I am no student of automobile history, but it seems to me that the primary driver of Ford's success was the massive production efficiencies and reduced costs associated with the modern moving assembly line. I have to imagine there were "better" cars than the Model T, or other cars that had more prototypes and iterations.
Anyhow, I don't really mean to dispute the author's thesis here, since there's not really enough evidence to judge it. But I'm having a really hard time being convinced that some factor other than Ford reducing the production time per car by a factor of almost 10 and the price by almost half was primarily responsible for the company's success with the Model T.
- 6ren 15y agoAh, so that's why "you can have any color as long as it's black". And wikipedia agrees with your conclusion: > Soon, companies had to have assembly lines, or risk going broke by not being able to compete; by 1930, 250 companies which did not had disappeared. It also notes iteration in the perfection of the assembly line itself, though going by its older name of trial and error.
- anamax 15y ago> I have to imagine there were "better" cars than the Model T, What definition of "better" are we using? (For example, higher top speed isn't relevant if you have bad roads.) > or other cars that had more prototypes and iterations. Prototypes and iterations cost money. Ford had more money, so why don't you assume more prototypes and iterations?
- InclinedPlane 15y agoBetter = more reliable, more comfortable, more capable. There were many cars of the time that were unarguably better than the Model T, but production and cost were the biggest factors of the Model T's success.