3 ms·
I hope their method of peer review allows anyone to be a reviewer and then the article gets published as long as >50% of the reviewers agree it is valid.
by jl6 5y ago
I hope their method of peer review allows anyone to be a reviewer and then the article gets published as long as >50% of the reviewers agree it is valid.
- jimmydorry 5y agoThat wouldn't be in the spirit of all things blockchain. What would stop a sybil-style attack of one bad actor reviewing a given article thousands of times?
- notahacker 5y ago> What would stop a sybil-style attack of one bad actor reviewing a given article thousands of times? We could make it an energy consumption competition? Consume the energy output of a small town for a year and the authors can trust that adding that comma into the opening sentence is the correct editorial decision to make
- newswasboring 5y agoSeriously cannot tell if you are joking or not. That in itself is scary.
- ShamelessC 5y agoSeems authors suggest three reviewers. from the website: [...] suggests three potential reviewers. Reviewers should be: Experts in the subject matter, Disinterested (i.e. not collaborators or personal friends). You do not need to know the reviewers beforehand, and a good starting point for finding reviewers are the authors of the related work you cite in your paper.