> It blows my mind that she was found guilty for defrauding investors, but not guilty for defrauding patients about their test results. Not excusing it. But ma

> It blows my mind that she was found guilty for defrauding investors, but not guilty for defrauding patients about their test results. Not excusing it. But maybe the jurors think the doctors and/or insurance companies ordered/interpreted these tests have some responsibilities too?