3 ms·
What are the long term consequences of investing in real state? Sure, you will have some who can't afford to own, but for those who can, aren't they growing the
by mgh2 5y ago
What are the long term consequences of investing in real state? Sure, you will have some who can't afford to own, but for those who can, aren't they growing the economy?
Think about the externalities, the fed prints money whenever the economy is in trouble and needs help (ex: recession, pandemic), this money is to be well invested for growth (real state, stocks, etc.): this injection/debt engenders more jobs, construction, population and demand growth. As long as this last part is done right [more money supply = more production] the economy will be kept healthy.
The problem arises when the above equation does not balance out- ex: Argentina, Greece, Turkey, etc. (i.e. crypto arguments), when people and governments do not produce to justify that investment (aka corruption and stealing).
Money's purpose is to be used for growth, so unlike the popular view of "inflating fiat steals your money", I don't think people understand money's purpose in the 1st place.
Except for artificially supply restricted markets (ex: single family zoning in California [recently abolished] or money laundering on empty homes in Canada, UK & Australia), mortgages are not intrinsically toxic.
- mgh2 5y ago*Edit: The problem arises when the above equation does not keep pace with growth- you can be in debt as long as you are also growing