> Who thinks they can analyse consciousness into more fundamental elements? I do. Considering consciousness, a property of animals on a planet in a star system

> Who thinks they can analyse consciousness into more fundamental elements? I do. Considering consciousness, a property of animals on a planet in a star system, irreducible and more fundamental than, say, quarks and bosons, seems laughably wrong to me. On the same level of wrong as medieval "geocentric" world views. I have a hard time imagining how those accomplished physicists think this way..