4 ms·
sure, but you'd need a better search engine if people are going to pay for it. A company with an objectively superior search engine could make even more money
by endisneigh 5y ago
sure, but you'd need a better search engine if people are going to pay for it.
A company with an objectively superior search engine could make even more money with ads so now you’re back to the beginning
- numbsafari 5y agoI don’t know if that follows. Google has been maximizing revenue at the expense of the search result quality. An “objectively superior” search engine, from an end user’s perspective, might have to make engineering choices that come at the expense of ad revenue. But we’re all just talking hypothesis, it’d be cool to see someone launch a startup to get some answers.