4 ms·

Oh calm down. The clear reason: "Mr Rogan has an exclusive deal with the streaming service [Spotify]", "several third-party channels have taken it upon themselv

by petee 5y ago

Oh calm down. The clear reason: "Mr Rogan has an exclusive deal with the streaming service [Spotify]", "several third-party channels have taken it upon themselves to post the episodes"...its a DMCA takedown, per Joe's contract. Something about conspiracy theories makes people just stop using their brains.

codeddesign 5y ago
I agree with you on this. However, Dr. Malone is very well known in his field and yet has been banned from both twitter and linkedin in the past few months (before the video aired). The wider issue goes beyond a simple DMCA. The guy is vaccinated, infected twice, a "senior-level" scientist in the field of infectious diseases, but is also outspoken against vaccine companies and forced jabbing.
- petee 5y ago
  I don't see how thats relevant here. He's also known for misinformation, but thats not why YouTube took it down
  - codeddesign 5y ago
    You mentioned conspiracy theories, so yes in the wider view there does seem to be a rampant issue with sheep. Not liking or agreeing with information is not the same as misinformation. Do you have a source to backup your claim?
    - petee 5y ago
      My point with that statement was the article posted clearly says the reason, but everyone piles on like its a conspiracy, ignoring the words in their face. The title is skewed and misleading to rile up people. (edited to remove words I didnt mean) He can't back up his information either, but I'm not a doctor. Other doctors disagree. Im sure I couldn't find a source you would accept. And most of us are not qualified to digest the information anyway. I've seen enough to regard him with a good grain of salt. I have no direct opinion on the subject either because I haven't been following, to be clear. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02483-w https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02483-w https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/08/robert-malone-vaccine-inventor-vaccine-skeptic/619734/ https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/08/robert-m...
s1artibartfast 5y ago
Is that quote from the link? I didn't see it
- petee 5y ago
  Its the beginning, I quoted relevant parts of the second and third sentences. DMCA is just a guess, but that is backed up by the facts as Rogan is Spotify only. Unedited full paragraph: "The episode in question, No 1757, was uploaded to Spotify on New Year's Eve, as Mr Rogan has an exclusive deal with the streaming service. While Mr Rogan no longer uploads full shows to YouTube, several third-party channels have taken it upon themselves to post the episodes that would otherwise only be available on Spotify." And the tag line under the title, "While the controversial episode remains on Spotify, YouTube has removed a video of the full interview which was uploaded by an unofficial channel"

by petee 5y ago

codeddesign 5y ago

I agree with you on this. However, Dr. Malone is very well known in his field and yet has been banned from both twitter and linkedin in the past few months (before the video aired). The wider issue goes beyond a simple DMCA. The guy is vaccinated, infected twice, a "senior-level" scientist in the field of infectious diseases, but is also outspoken against vaccine companies and forced jabbing.

petee 5y ago
I don't see how thats relevant here. He's also known for misinformation, but thats not why YouTube took it down
- codeddesign 5y ago
  You mentioned conspiracy theories, so yes in the wider view there does seem to be a rampant issue with sheep. Not liking or agreeing with information is not the same as misinformation. Do you have a source to backup your claim?
  - petee 5y ago
    My point with that statement was the article posted clearly says the reason, but everyone piles on like its a conspiracy, ignoring the words in their face. The title is skewed and misleading to rile up people. (edited to remove words I didnt mean) He can't back up his information either, but I'm not a doctor. Other doctors disagree. Im sure I couldn't find a source you would accept. And most of us are not qualified to digest the information anyway. I've seen enough to regard him with a good grain of salt. I have no direct opinion on the subject either because I haven't been following, to be clear. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02483-w https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02483-w https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/08/robert-malone-vaccine-inventor-vaccine-skeptic/619734/ https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/08/robert-m...

s1artibartfast 5y ago

Is that quote from the link? I didn't see it

petee 5y ago
Its the beginning, I quoted relevant parts of the second and third sentences. DMCA is just a guess, but that is backed up by the facts as Rogan is Spotify only. Unedited full paragraph: "The episode in question, No 1757, was uploaded to Spotify on New Year's Eve, as Mr Rogan has an exclusive deal with the streaming service. While Mr Rogan no longer uploads full shows to YouTube, several third-party channels have taken it upon themselves to post the episodes that would otherwise only be available on Spotify." And the tag line under the title, "While the controversial episode remains on Spotify, YouTube has removed a video of the full interview which was uploaded by an unofficial channel"