3 ms·
He also retweeted claims that the Covid vaccines killed twice as many people as they saved. Being critical of the vaccine is one thing, but that crosses into a
by freyr 5y ago
He also retweeted claims that the Covid vaccines killed twice as many people as they saved.
Being critical of the vaccine is one thing, but that crosses into an extraordinary and borderline mathematically-infeasible claim that defies virtually all the published data and observations provided by the rest of the scientific and medical community, and requires strong evidence to support it.
- mannanj 5y agoThere is data from VAERS and Vsafe that supports his claims though. So hardly “mathematically infeasible”. There is literally no other data available to you or I. What data are you using to support your claim?
- _dw7s 5y agohttps://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html > When evaluating data from VAERS, it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause-and-effect relationship has been established. Reports of all possible associations between vaccines and adverse events (possible side effects) are filed in VAERS. Therefore, VAERS collects data on any adverse event following vaccination, be it coincidental or truly caused by a vaccine. The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event. What data supports what claim? You are also aware that anyone can submit reports to VAERS, right? Until someone actively investigates the case and finds it was indeed caused by the vaccine, the VAERS data does not show anything. Using VAERS as your 'data' in a rhetoric is highly unscientific. Let's also not forget how the raw VAERS data was used during the autism-vaccine link litigation. We should know better.