3 ms·

Never heard of him, but seems like he's published a lot of scientific articles on vaccines over the past 20+ years. He has a personal website with some more de

Never heard of him, but seems like he's published a lot of scientific articles on vaccines over the past 20+ years. He has a personal website with some more details on who he is: https://www.rwmalonemd.com/ https://www.rwmalonemd.com/ In his own words, he's a scientist that believes in vaccines, but believe that too many shortcuts has been taken in developing the Covid-vaccines, and that big pharma has too much influence in forcing them onto everyone. Don't know if this is true or not, but just a quick summary of what his stance seems to be.

skyde 5y ago
thanks for the unbiased summary we need more people like you
freyr 5y ago
He also retweeted claims that the Covid vaccines killed twice as many people as they saved. Being critical of the vaccine is one thing, but that crosses into an extraordinary and borderline mathematically-infeasible claim that defies virtually all the published data and observations provided by the rest of the scientific and medical community, and requires strong evidence to support it.
- mannanj 5y ago
  There is data from VAERS and Vsafe that supports his claims though. So hardly “mathematically infeasible”. There is literally no other data available to you or I. What data are you using to support your claim?
  - _dw7s 5y ago
    https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html > When evaluating data from VAERS, it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause-and-effect relationship has been established. Reports of all possible associations between vaccines and adverse events (possible side effects) are filed in VAERS. Therefore, VAERS collects data on any adverse event following vaccination, be it coincidental or truly caused by a vaccine. The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event. What data supports what claim? You are also aware that anyone can submit reports to VAERS, right? Until someone actively investigates the case and finds it was indeed caused by the vaccine, the VAERS data does not show anything. Using VAERS as your 'data' in a rhetoric is highly unscientific. Let's also not forget how the raw VAERS data was used during the autism-vaccine link litigation. We should know better.

skyde 5y ago

thanks for the unbiased summary we need more people like you

freyr 5y ago

He also retweeted claims that the Covid vaccines killed twice as many people as they saved. Being critical of the vaccine is one thing, but that crosses into an extraordinary and borderline mathematically-infeasible claim that defies virtually all the published data and observations provided by the rest of the scientific and medical community, and requires strong evidence to support it.

mannanj 5y ago
There is data from VAERS and Vsafe that supports his claims though. So hardly “mathematically infeasible”. There is literally no other data available to you or I. What data are you using to support your claim?
- _dw7s 5y ago
  https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html > When evaluating data from VAERS, it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause-and-effect relationship has been established. Reports of all possible associations between vaccines and adverse events (possible side effects) are filed in VAERS. Therefore, VAERS collects data on any adverse event following vaccination, be it coincidental or truly caused by a vaccine. The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event. What data supports what claim? You are also aware that anyone can submit reports to VAERS, right? Until someone actively investigates the case and finds it was indeed caused by the vaccine, the VAERS data does not show anything. Using VAERS as your 'data' in a rhetoric is highly unscientific. Let's also not forget how the raw VAERS data was used during the autism-vaccine link litigation. We should know better.