Let's say it actually worked though. I.e., it was just production level audio equipment, rather than woo. Does that make it okay for them to sell it to those on

Let's say it actually worked though. I.e., it was just production level audio equipment, rather than woo. Does that make it okay for them to sell it to those on a fixed income? Not defending it, just seems weird to decry it for taking money away from people who can't afford it, when the whole positioning is "makes audio sound better". Decry it simply for the fact it doesn't work, not that people who can't afford it spend money on it.