3 ms·
I had a similar experience with Vista (64-bit). I always ran it on at least a dual-core CPU with lots of RAM, and it was more stable than XP and ran fast enough
by theandrewbailey 5y ago
I had a similar experience with Vista (64-bit). I always ran it on at least a dual-core CPU with lots of RAM, and it was more stable than XP and ran fast enough. All the hardware I wanted to use with it worked. The only awesome things about it were the start menu search bar and Aero, otherwise it was fine (boring, did what it needed to). I seem to be the only one with that opinion.