7 ms·

People get triggered by unsubstantiated bullshit claims. To frame the modern world in terms of "colonizers" is misleading bullshit. As for wildlife, what do y

People get triggered by unsubstantiated bullshit claims. To frame the modern world in terms of "colonizers" is misleading bullshit. As for wildlife, what do you want, the right to drive your wildlife to extinction, too? Really? And you would prefer if no tourists come to Africa? Are you sure those are good ideas? Who is forcing you to tolerate tourists to see African wildlife? Will the "colonizers" come with tanks and airplanes to force the "colonized" to open up their parks for tourists, if people in Africa should decide to shut them down? In reality, with the lost income from tourism, people would probably resort to eating the wildlife until it is gone, like in other parts of the world. And then you'd be left with nothing.

naruvimama 5y ago
https://theprint.in/pageturner/excerpt/why-43-of-british-still-think-colonial-empire-was-a-good-thing-and-a-source-of-pride/572651/ https://theprint.in/pageturner/excerpt/why-43-of-british-sti... This a far cry from the constant guilt laid on the shoulders of Germans. The Germans paid a heavy price but the treasury of the colonies held in British banks went on to pay the pensions of the colonisers. > As for wildlife, what do you want, the right to drive your wildlife to extinction, too? If that is how you understood it, you probably need to improve your reading and critical thinking skills. What I meant is that Europeans whose national boundaries are marked by language, religious denomination, and have (very recent) history of wiping out both wildlife and civilisations should stop being preachy.
- kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
  "the treasury of the colonies held in British banks went on to pay the pensions of the colonisers." A lot of things went in in the past. Didn't humans evolve in Afrika? So I guess the ancestors of todays Africans somehow drove my ancestors away, presumably by stealing their land. Am I owed reparations by Africa now? "What I meant is that Europeans whose national boundaries are marked by language, religious denomination, and have (very recent) history of wiping out both wildlife and civilisations should stop being preachy." They are preachy about not killing off your wildlife, so if you say they shouldn't preach about that, it follows logically that you think killing off the wildlife should be OK. And sorry, but everybody is free to preach about whatever they want. You are free not to listen.
  - naruvimama 5y ago
    I am not talking about reparations. No one is looking for charity or concessions from Europeans anyway. I do not think very many people hold a grudge either. You are just firing all over the place. My statement is simple, Europeans are used to seeing their colonies as a poorer and miserable mirror image of themselves. As much as a white evangelist see their recent converts, as a white man's burden. Except for political independence, colonial institutions and traditions remain the same on both sides. Whether it is the BBC, the labour party, the royalty or the universities their mindset remains in the colonial Era. There is a clear repulsion to intellectual independence or the ex-colonies developing independent institutions. This revulsion is similar to the one a white evangelist feels when native traditions or religions make a come back and he/she is loosing his/her flock.
    - kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
      Why do people in Africa care what BBC or whoever thinks? And where is the great come back that people are supposedly revulsed by? I really don't know what point you are trying to make or what your goals are. Last I heard China is buying up Africa anyway, maybe you'll be more happy with that future.
      - naruvimama 5y ago
        I must apologize, I realize that when you are stepping on someone else's feet of course you do not feel the pain.
        kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
        Explain how for example the BBC from your mentions, which broadcasts more than 1000km away from Africa, steps on the toes of people in Africa? Maybe just concentrate on feeling less like a victim, and you'll realize your toe is actually finde.
        prmph 5y ago

naruvimama 5y ago

https://theprint.in/pageturner/excerpt/why-43-of-british-still-think-colonial-empire-was-a-good-thing-and-a-source-of-pride/572651/ https://theprint.in/pageturner/excerpt/why-43-of-british-sti... This a far cry from the constant guilt laid on the shoulders of Germans. The Germans paid a heavy price but the treasury of the colonies held in British banks went on to pay the pensions of the colonisers. > As for wildlife, what do you want, the right to drive your wildlife to extinction, too? If that is how you understood it, you probably need to improve your reading and critical thinking skills. What I meant is that Europeans whose national boundaries are marked by language, religious denomination, and have (very recent) history of wiping out both wildlife and civilisations should stop being preachy.

kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
"the treasury of the colonies held in British banks went on to pay the pensions of the colonisers." A lot of things went in in the past. Didn't humans evolve in Afrika? So I guess the ancestors of todays Africans somehow drove my ancestors away, presumably by stealing their land. Am I owed reparations by Africa now? "What I meant is that Europeans whose national boundaries are marked by language, religious denomination, and have (very recent) history of wiping out both wildlife and civilisations should stop being preachy." They are preachy about not killing off your wildlife, so if you say they shouldn't preach about that, it follows logically that you think killing off the wildlife should be OK. And sorry, but everybody is free to preach about whatever they want. You are free not to listen.
- naruvimama 5y ago
  I am not talking about reparations. No one is looking for charity or concessions from Europeans anyway. I do not think very many people hold a grudge either. You are just firing all over the place. My statement is simple, Europeans are used to seeing their colonies as a poorer and miserable mirror image of themselves. As much as a white evangelist see their recent converts, as a white man's burden. Except for political independence, colonial institutions and traditions remain the same on both sides. Whether it is the BBC, the labour party, the royalty or the universities their mindset remains in the colonial Era. There is a clear repulsion to intellectual independence or the ex-colonies developing independent institutions. This revulsion is similar to the one a white evangelist feels when native traditions or religions make a come back and he/she is loosing his/her flock.
  - kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
    Why do people in Africa care what BBC or whoever thinks? And where is the great come back that people are supposedly revulsed by? I really don't know what point you are trying to make or what your goals are. Last I heard China is buying up Africa anyway, maybe you'll be more happy with that future.
    - naruvimama 5y ago
      I must apologize, I realize that when you are stepping on someone else's feet of course you do not feel the pain.
      - kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
        Explain how for example the BBC from your mentions, which broadcasts more than 1000km away from Africa, steps on the toes of people in Africa? Maybe just concentrate on feeling less like a victim, and you'll realize your toe is actually finde.
        prmph 5y ago