4 ms·
Such a major problem is likely to raise questions about the reliability of cloud computing versus local storage. Is anyone surprised this happened? It doesn't
by cbs 15y ago
Such a major problem is likely to raise questions about the reliability of cloud computing versus local storage.
Is anyone surprised this happened? It doesn't actually raise any questions about the reliability. Those answers were known when it was built. The first rule of network programming: the network is unreliable. The real question is: why do we keep playing along, blissfully ignoring that?
- boredguy8 15y agoOh please: we don't play along blissfully ignoring that. Arguably the biggest contribution to information theory is Shannon's source coding theorem, and we haven't forgotten it. For day-to-day work, the redundancy & reliability of something Google Docs is much greater than a client computer. RAID is expensive. Backplanes fail. Laptops fall. But now instead of waiting 2-4 hours for a reimage & file transfer, I can take a base image, go to docs.google.com, and be up and running in the time it takes to walk a laptop to my office. Or, if more pressing: in the time it takes to log in at my coworker's machine. So I'm curious: what's with the pseudo-FUD?
- cbs 15y ago>For day-to-day work, the redundancy & reliability of something Google Docs is much greater than a client computer. Of google docs, yes. Of always having a network connection to docs, no. Maybe its just the environments I've been in, but at every client, employer, or place I've visited, my devices were more reliable than the network connection. Hell, last year the level 3 uplink for most of my state was out for a day. In both cases you need a working computer to edit a file, but only one of them also requires a network connection. The only advantages you have are that software deploys faster because you're using a 21-centurly terminal emulator and the file under work is stored on the network. Just because we as developers haven't put the solutions to quick and easy deployment of software packages and file redundancy into the hands of users doesn't make the cloud a panacea. We have these tools for us already. If my desktop fails, my latest-version files were on its hard drive, the network drive and usb flash drive, all synced after every save. I can grab a laptop or my co-workers machine and in the time it takes me to plug in a flash drive or just hit up a lan repository I'll have the files as they were at time of failure. If the other computer doesn't have the software, if I could hit up google docs on the other machine, I can easily smack 1 command into the terminal and in 30 seconds be ready to roll (and that server could be local, too, not relying on internet uplink). I'm not against relying on the network at all, but doing so in a manner that doesn't demand an always-on connection to get work done. A solution that relies on the availability of network OR local machine and can gracefully handle the fault of one or the other is orders of magnitude more reliable than a solution that relies on BOTH network and local machine.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- MatthewPhillips 15y agoGoogle Docs works offline now.
- chc 15y agoThat just means that if you already had Google Docs open, you'll be able to keep typing away and it'll commit the changes when it gets a network connection again. It doesn't mean you can access your Google Docs (i.e. open up Chrome and type "docs.google.com" and expect anything to happen) without a network connection.
- MatthewPhillips 15y agoYes, you can.
- chc 15y agoI just turned off my Wi-Fi and typed "docs.google.com" into the address bar — Chrome says it can't find the site. So I, at least, can't. Based on the Google blog post about offline Google docs, it looks like it's a lot more complicated than that.
- MatthewPhillips 15y agoYou have to turn it on. When online and in Docs, click on the gear thingy in the top-right. There should have been an intro/help pop-up when you logged in after they rolled out the feature, did for me.
- chc 15y agoWeird, I never got it, and I'm on Docs daily. Guess I'm just an outlier. Thanks for setting me straight.
- dpark 15y agoBecause the reality is that a computer without an Internet connection has no significant value for 99% of people. Also, let's not forget that for most people, minor downtime is a nuisance, not a real problem. It's annoying when I can't reach a web service I rely on, but it rarely if ever costs me money. With businesses, this can be a different proposition, but even then the savings from going "to the cloud" may more than offset any downtime costs.
- WettowelReactor 15y agoNothing is 100% reliable. The question is is the frequency/type of downtime vs. cost is more efficient (cost effective) in the cloud than doing it yourself. For some, especially small non-tech shops the answer is yes.